crawlejg said:
It contains Sodium Dichloro-s-Triazinetrione Hydrate. Ugh! I didn't know that was CYA.
Sneaky, isn't it? I've been trying to get the manufacturers to explicitly add the effective CYA content for stabilized chlorine and the CH content for Cal-Hypo and they could even add the net resulting salt content as well (along with the chlorinating liquid and bleach manufacturers), but they just say that they are limited by the EPA that regulates labeling via FIFRA rules. However, such rules do not require long expensive tests and submissions for label changes that do not relate to dosages, instructions for usage, or efficacy claims. Stating a simple chemical fact would be no different than an address change and take no more than 30 days with minimal cost (I checked this with the EPA).
The manufacturers are intentionally withholding materially important information that consumers need to know to make informed purchase decisions (the definition of fraud, though legally they can claim that they do disclose the ingredients and it's up to consumers to figure out the consequences, perhaps consulting a chemist!) because they don't want you to know the side effects of continued use of their products that can lead to algae growth requiring you to buy algaecides that they also sell at even higher profit margins. They don't completely hide the facts since they do say in product literature that stabilized chlorine adds CYA, but they are not specific as to how much they add even though the following rules are chemical facts independent of concentration of product or of pool/spa water volume:
For every 10 ppm Free Chlorine (FC) added by Trichlor, it also increases Cyanuric Acid (CYA) by 6 ppm.
For every 10 ppm FC added by Dichlor, it also increases CYA by 9 ppm.
For every 10 ppm FC added by Cal-Hypo, it also increases Calcium Hardness (CH) by at least 7 ppm.
Some simple math shows that even with a low daily chlorine demand of 1 ppm FC, continued use of Trichlor pucks/tabs adds over 100 ppm CYA in 6 months if there is no water dilution. Of course, the stabilized chlorine manufacturers say that CYA is no problem, not even at 100 ppm and that you shouldn't even think about CYA until it gets to at least 200 ppm. They then recommend 1-3 ppm FC (most Chemtura products including BioGuard) or 1-1.5 ppm FC (most Advantis products including GLB) which are woefully inadequate for the higher CYA levels in any pool unlucky enough to have sufficient nutrients for algae. These companies then offer "no-algae guaranteed" programs that include, to no one's surprise, algaecide from those companies and also typically include clarifiers to keep the water clear since the slower oxidation of bather waste can otherwise cloud the water -- another side effect of high CYA without proportionately high FC.
There is no question that Trichlor pucks/tabs are very convenient as slow-dissolving sources of chlorine; an SWG is, of course, even more convenient. There are many pool owners who would just as soon pay more, including use of algaecides and clarifiers, for that convenience. However, as we know from many users on this and other forums, there are many other pool owners who have no problem adding chlorinating liquid or bleach regularly and maintaining their pools at lower cost. It's a cost/convenience trade-off that consumers should be able to make with a full disclosure of facts.
Richard