Hello,
You guys have probably heard about copper ionizers, like this one:
I got 2 of them and I don't really see copper levels increasing, so I'm afraid to decrease my chlorine levels.
Also, here are my calculations:
I currently use 50 lb of chlorine tablets per season = $240/season
The ionizer's manufacturer claims I will decrease my chlorine levels by 80%. Although there's a conflicting claim, as they recommend to still have 2-3 ppm of chlorine, which is not 80% less than I normally use.
Let's say I will be able to use only 1/3 of my current chlorine = $240/3 = $80/season
For my 30K gallon pool I will need 2 ionizers = 2x$120 = $240
And I will need to buy replacement copper rods every season = $70/pair = $70/season
So without the accounting for the ionizers price, I would be able to save $240 - ($80 + $70) = $90/season.
So it will take more than 2 years to pay off the ionizers' price and only then I will be able to save $90/season.
But I will also need to brush off the oxidized copper rods every 5 - 7 days (otherwise it will prevent effective copper ionization), which is not a very quick task.
Another problem is that after 3 weeks of using the ionizer, the copper level in my pool is about 0.1 - 0.2 (measured by 2 different tests) and the recommended level is 0.4 - 0.9. The manufacturer claimed good level will be reached in about a week.
So to me, it seems that it's not worth it, but maybe I'm wrong? Maybe these things work really well, and I really will be able to use 80% less chlorine (I think I normally use 4-6ppm of the top of my head) and that the ionizers work even if I don't see expected copper levels in the pool?
What do you guys think?
You guys have probably heard about copper ionizers, like this one:
I got 2 of them and I don't really see copper levels increasing, so I'm afraid to decrease my chlorine levels.
Also, here are my calculations:
I currently use 50 lb of chlorine tablets per season = $240/season
The ionizer's manufacturer claims I will decrease my chlorine levels by 80%. Although there's a conflicting claim, as they recommend to still have 2-3 ppm of chlorine, which is not 80% less than I normally use.
Let's say I will be able to use only 1/3 of my current chlorine = $240/3 = $80/season
For my 30K gallon pool I will need 2 ionizers = 2x$120 = $240
And I will need to buy replacement copper rods every season = $70/pair = $70/season
So without the accounting for the ionizers price, I would be able to save $240 - ($80 + $70) = $90/season.
So it will take more than 2 years to pay off the ionizers' price and only then I will be able to save $90/season.
But I will also need to brush off the oxidized copper rods every 5 - 7 days (otherwise it will prevent effective copper ionization), which is not a very quick task.
Another problem is that after 3 weeks of using the ionizer, the copper level in my pool is about 0.1 - 0.2 (measured by 2 different tests) and the recommended level is 0.4 - 0.9. The manufacturer claimed good level will be reached in about a week.
So to me, it seems that it's not worth it, but maybe I'm wrong? Maybe these things work really well, and I really will be able to use 80% less chlorine (I think I normally use 4-6ppm of the top of my head) and that the ionizers work even if I don't see expected copper levels in the pool?
What do you guys think?