I have a VS pump and have been favouring lower speeds. I have time periods where it run low, and others where it runs relatively fast.
With the low speeds I have noticed:
1. surface skimming is really slow and arguably not very effective.
2. SWG is not kicking in at these low levels.
A side note : I also wonder if the SWG "%" setting takes into account these low flow conditions when calculating % generation or disregards them. Trying to get a feel for how "active" the SWG is....
Now I am thinking, I should keep my pump speed above that minimum SWG generation level to avoid the % uncertainty. I would be making better use of the pump time, for both filtration and SWG generation, and drop those relatively faster time periods. Constant low rpm, above the SWG generation threshold, adjust time and SWG percentage, done.
As recommended Determine Pump Run Time I think it is reasonable to split the run time to get better coverage for varying conditions throughout the day.
Are my conclusions reasonable? Do you see a reason for needing faster pump time periods?
Cheers,
With the low speeds I have noticed:
1. surface skimming is really slow and arguably not very effective.
2. SWG is not kicking in at these low levels.
A side note : I also wonder if the SWG "%" setting takes into account these low flow conditions when calculating % generation or disregards them. Trying to get a feel for how "active" the SWG is....
Now I am thinking, I should keep my pump speed above that minimum SWG generation level to avoid the % uncertainty. I would be making better use of the pump time, for both filtration and SWG generation, and drop those relatively faster time periods. Constant low rpm, above the SWG generation threshold, adjust time and SWG percentage, done.
As recommended Determine Pump Run Time I think it is reasonable to split the run time to get better coverage for varying conditions throughout the day.
Are my conclusions reasonable? Do you see a reason for needing faster pump time periods?
Cheers,