Unexplained pH rise

I think this time it was Proavia who mentioned that. But yes, good advice.
kudos to Gene!
Thanks
Looking back thru this thread, I was actually replying to @key1cc .
Maybe those posts should be split into their own thread.

Regardless - a CSI in the 0.00 to -0.30 (negative 0.30) range is best to minimize scale in the SWG no matter the pool surface. Without a SWG, monitoring CSI isn't needed in a fiberglass or vinyl pool.
 
All the fibreglass companies here recommend a pH of 7.2-7.4 but don’t say why and its a non negotiable warrantee condition - disgraceful. The pH range in our AU standard for domestic pool water quality is given as 7.0 - 7.8 which means all these FG pools are not built to the AU standard.

Why would they negotiate, saves them lots of money by rejecting warranty claims. Which percentage of its life does a pool actually spend between pH 7.2 and 7.4, even if you tried hard? Especially with the TA range that I suspect they'd be demanding - also non negotiable.
 
What would be the problem if the CSI was acceptable but the CH was greater than 500?
I can't answer that for a FG pool. I can't really answer that for a plaster pool either. Some here let (or are forced to let) their CH get higher than that, 700 or more. And compensate that by maintaining pH out of range to satisfy CSI. I can't speak to the long term effects of that practice. I assume it is too difficult or expensive to exchange water to lower CH, so they do what they do.

I chose a different MO (I think I already described it). I use a water softener to minimize CH, and I'm now exchanging water once a year, in the Spring. I'll exchange whatever is needed to bring my CH back down to the middle of TFP's recommended range. After doing that, maintaining all the other levels, especially pH, is a breeze. Based on preliminary data, because of my softener, the exchange should be relatively small, a few hundred gallons. That's easy for me, and quite affordable. And more importantly to me, safer for my pool. I don't want to wait years and then have to exchange 80% of my water. Not so much because of the cost of the water, but because of the potential danger of exposing the structure of my pool to that kind of stress. I would think the stress on a FG or vinyl pool would be much, much worse.

I don't have the science, just an instinct. Keeping all the levels within range, which produces a near perfect CSI, just makes more sense to me. Maintaining one out of whack to compensate for another that I let get out of whack seems counter productive.

There's another potential reason, but I don't hear it discussed much here. I want my pH to be as close to my eyes' pH as possible. It could be my imagination, but I get itchy eyes and skin when my pH is too far from 7.6. Real or imagined, it's still itchy! So maintaining a CH that keeps my CSI happy with a pH that keeps my eyes happy is what works best for me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jonpcar
I always calculate my current CSI but also like to know where it’s trending to. With a low pH my water is a little corrosive but as the pH and TA slowly increases my CSI is trending towards a neutral value.

Scale on the swg plate surface is a bit beyond long term CSI predictions. Hydroxide is being produced at the cell plate surface forcing the pH and CSI up and beyond the CSI calculation range. As long as the SWG is self cleaning and working properly scaling shouldnt be a big issue. As a cell ages a little scaling can occur even to the self cleaning cells.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xDom and mgtfp
There's another potential reason, but I don't hear it discussed much here. I want my pH to be as close to my eyes' pH as possible. It could be my imagination, but I get itchy eyes and skin when my pH is too far from 7.6. Real or imagined, it's still itchy! So maintaining a CH that keeps my CSI happy with a pH that keeps my eyes happy is what works best for me.

There will be some people that are going to be more sensitive then others but in general both skin and eyes can tolerate quite a broad range. Eye preparations have a pH range from the high 6’s to the low 8’s. Millions of people are in the ocean every day where the pH is 8.3 with little to no reports of sensitivities. There is a bit of a myth in the industry that believes the ideal target pH of 7.5 is directly related to eye pH. Pickens in this article found that a reduction in pH from 8 to 7 actually resulted in an increase in reported sensitivities.
 
There will be some people that are going to be more sensitive then others but in general both skin and eyes can tolerate quite a broad range. Eye preparations have a pH range from the high 6’s to the low 8’s. Millions of people are in the ocean every day where the pH is 8.3 with little to no reports of sensitivities. There is a bit of a myth in the industry that believes the ideal target pH of 7.5 is directly related to eye pH. Pickens in this article found that a reduction in pH from 8 to 7 actually resulted in an increase in reported sensitivities.
Good info. I didn't know about eye pH until I learned it here. So my perception of the "ideal pH" for my eyes could very well be some sort of placebo effect. But the skin and eye irritation occurred before I found TFP. That was real. I had assumed it was chlorine related. Someone here explained it was more likely to be the acid overdosing, that my pool guy was doing, than the chlorine overdosing. Might have been the same thread that discussed the eye pH. The 7.5 number is what had stuck in my head.

Regardless, once I took over the pool, and figured out how to keep the pH and chlorine stable 24/7, the irritation went away. I do have other skin and eye issues (like problems with things with fragrance: laundry soaps, women's perfumes and lotions), so maybe I'm one of the "sensitive ones."

Fixing my pool was much easier than trying to convince the women in my life to give up one of their magic potions, that's for sure!

110+ Ugly Makeup Stock Illustrations, Royalty-Free Vector Graphics & Clip  Art - iStock | Bad makeup, Heavy makeup, Ugly woman
 
Last edited:

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
It would still increase from there. Evaporation leaves TA behind, and then you add more with fresh fill water. But with TA 30 fill water, that should be a slow process.

And each acid addition will bring TA down. There's a simple rule of thumb for those thinking metric: Take your pool volume in hecto litre, replace the hecto with a milli, and that's the acid amount that will reduce your pool by pretty much 5ppm. Example: You have a 30000 litre pool, that's 300 hecto litres. An acid addition of 300 milli litres (full strength MA) will reduce your TA by about 5ppm.

I wouldn't go below 50. You want some buffering left for things going wrong. Acid container slipped, acid added instead of bleach, it has all happened before. Pool service who takes over while on holidays throws in a few pucks. Whatever.

One issue with pH 8 is that you don't know if pH is actually higher, unless you have a well calibrated electronic meter.

Australian standard AS 3634 for private pools wants pH to be not higher than 7.8. This doesn't make much sense as a standalone rule, for the risks with higher pH they are mentioning things like reduced chlorine effectiveness (which is only valid without CYA) or scaling (it's not pH alone, CSI counts). In the end it's up to you what to make of that, and that you understand what you are doing and potential consequences.

Another thing is that around pH 8, and quite pronounced above 8, FC loss to UV starts to become more significant, particularly at higher FC/CYA ratios:


I usually let pH ride through winter up to 8. In summer, I usually keep it below 7.8, I need those acid additions then anyway to stop my TA from rising. TA usually between 70 and 90.
So do you regularly test for TA? I read in another of your posts somewhere you don't add any TA increaser? What is your fill water TA?
 
I always test TA before adding acid. And no, I don't add TA increaser. Fill water TA is about 30ppm, too low to explain the rise I am seeing (or the drop I am not seeing despite the acid additions). Not quite sure what's going on there.
But all in all quite easy to maintain. Add some acid every 2 or 3 weeks, in winter less frequently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JamesW
add some acid every 2 or 3 weeks, in winter less frequently.
So when you say that you add acid less frequently in winter, is this because the pH rises slower in winter or is it because you don't mind the pH being slightly higher in winter?
Is it that you want the pH higher to counter the CSI change due to water temp?
 
So when you say that you add acid less frequently in winter, is this because the pH rises slower in winter or is it because you don't mind the pH being slightly higher in winter?
Is it that you want the pH higher to counter the CSI change due to water temp?

Kind of all of the above.
 
Same here. In winter I stop running my SWG. There is an ongoing debate about the affects of an SWG on pH. I think I'm in the "it does" camp. But I also allow my pH to rise a bit in the winter (7.8-8.0), to counter the effects the low water temp has on my CSI. As we've been discussing, the less you try to force pH down, the less acid you'll use (exponentially). Either way, my pool's acid consumption goes way down in the winter with the SWG off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xDom
But you turn it on occasionally to keep a minimum FC!?

Most US SWGs turn off below a certain temperature, and people have to switch to liquid chlorine over winter.

We are quite lucky that our SWGs are designed to keep running through winter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dirk
What is the winter pump runtime in regards to the summer run time ?
During the middle of the night, every night:
Vac runs 1.5 hours all year'round (no SWG during that run).

During the day, each day:
4 hours no-SWG for ~3 months of winter
4 hours SWG for Spring months
4 hours SWG for Fall months
8 hours SWG for Summer months (swim season)*

* I could do less runtime in the Summer months, but need 8 hours for the solar heater, which is only used in swim season.
The exact number of months for each of these seasons varies year to year. Swim season is usually about 5-6 months, depending on how much "shrinkage" I'm willing to endure! :ROFLMAO:

George Costanza Shrinkage GIFs | Tenor
 
Last edited:
But you turn it on occasionally to keep a minimum FC!?
No, it's virtually unpluged. It wouldn't run if I wanted it to, below about 52°F. I dose the pool manually with liquid chlorine, once a week, for about 12 weeks a year (so ~12 times, which is not too bad, chore-wise).

I have a little gizmo that doses the LC slowly, I can walk away and do other weekly pool maintenance chores. So I'd be out there either way, the manual LC dosing chore is not actually additional time, and very little extra effort.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.