Unexplained FC Loss

revitup

Gold Supporter
Silver Supporter
Bronze Supporter
Nov 30, 2019
852
Pawleys Island, SC
Pool Size
8500
Surface
Fiberglass
Chlorine
Salt Water Generator
SWG Type
Hayward Aqua Rite (T-15)
My SCG has been humming along forever, holding FC around 10, certainly in the 9-11.5 range. I check it pretty much every day (way too much I know) and with the SCG producing 3.0 ppm/day, so lots of data points. See my logs.
A few days ago I skipped a day and when I checked the morning after I was at 4.0 FC. When I last checked two days before FC was 10.0. Somehow, in two days, FC went down 6.0 ppm. That is unprecedented in my pool.
I brought FC up to 9.0 with liquid chlorine and it has held fine since. Looking for an explanation for that unexpected one time FC loss.
-Not likely a one time algae visit. Performed a OCLT just in case, zero FC loss overnight. Water is clear.
-Testing error? I re-did the test 3 times
-SCG coincidentally stopped working for those two days? Not very likely, no error messages, working fine now and I didn’t touch it.
All that brings me to the one thing I did different in those two days. I added 8 lbs of calcium chloride the day before the mystery FC 4.0 test result. Could the addition of calcium chloride cause a one time FC crash?
 
I also had a relatively quick drop in FC recently, but mine ended up being an algae bloom. I’ve kept FC in the 7-10 range all year, but watched it drop from 8 to 5 in a day or 2. OCLT revealed that I had a problem, so I did a SLAM that only took a couple of days to pass the SLAM success criteria. Maybe you caught the early stage of algae and your 9.0 dosage knocked it out?
 
We have seen others where FC dropped after adding calcium.. Not sure why but I have read at least 2 others have the same issue... It should not happen at all and really no reason for it... ???
 
I searched and also saw other posts documenting this phenomenon. I went back in my logs and noted a similar FC drop in the past although not as drastic, probably because it was lesser amounts of calcium chloride added. I think the correlation between calcium chloride addition and FC drop is clear enough (even if we haven’t figured out why) to merit a mention in the ABCs or somewhere.
 
There is no direct reaction between calcium chloride and chlorine. Calcium chloride will add chloride ions to solutions. Large additions of calcium chloride can cause temporary cloudiness due to formation of calcium carbonate precipitates.

8lbs of pure calcium chloride will increase the CH in your pool by 100ppm. It will also increase your salt level by 130ppm. If you added the CH increased all at once near the skimmer or into the skimmer, the high chloride load could cause your Aquarite to throw a high salt error and possibly shutdown. I’m not familiar enough with the operations of Hayward cells to say so but perhaps @JamesW might comment on a large chloride load affecting cell output.

Unless a mechanism can be proposed for calcium causing a direct loss of chlorine, PoolSchool will not be changed. Anecdotal evidence is not sufficient.
 
I added 8 lbs of calcium chloride the day before the mystery FC 4.0 test result.
What exact brand and SKU?

Possibly contaminants in the mix that react with chlorine could reduce the FC.

Adding calcium chloride is really not too different from adding regular salt.

If the chloride addition goes through the cell in a concentrated enough solution to cause the amps to go above 8.0, it will shut off with a high salt warning for the remainder of the 180 minute cycle.

However, it should resume production on the next cycle.
 
This is the calcium chloride I use. I broadcast it in the shallow end, as far away from the skimmer possible. I sweep it back and forth until it’s dissolved. I suppose a concentration could get to the cell but I take pains to avoid that. Short of turning the pump off. I only do that for salt addition. Hope not turning the pump off for calcium chloride addition doesn’t harm the cell like it would for salt.
 

Attachments

  • C0210167-A20F-43C5-B042-A3840FA448DA.jpeg
    C0210167-A20F-43C5-B042-A3840FA448DA.jpeg
    229.3 KB · Views: 8
I have seen reports of FC loss with the addition of salt and with the addition of calcium chloride.

I suspect that certain contaminants might reduce the FC, but I don't what the contaminants might be.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
If the anticaking agent yellow prussiate of soda is in the salt or calcium chloride, it might react with the chlorine like this.

2Na4[Fe(CN)6] + Cl2 --> 2Na3[Fe(CN)6] + 2Na+ + 2CL-

The iron goes from the Fe2+ to the Fe3+ state as it is oxidized by the chlorine.
 
2Na4[Fe(CN)6] + Cl2 --> 2Na3[Fe(CN)6] + 2Na+ + 2CL

Good thing James knows that language, because I'm over like .............

full
 
  • Like
Reactions: cowboycasey
If the anticaking agent yellow prussiate of soda is in the salt or calcium chloride, it might react with the chlorine like this.

2Na4[Fe(CN)6] + Cl2 --> 2Na3[Fe(CN)6] + 2Na+ + 2CL-

The iron goes from the Fe2+ to the Fe3+ state as it is oxidized by the chlorine.

Problem is, the math doesn't really work out in favor of that chemical reaction (although, it is a plausible reaction as YPS is a reducing agent). You need about 12.85ppm of YPS to neutralize 6ppm of FC. In an 8500 gallon pool, that would require an addition of about 0.91 lbs of YPS. The amount of CaCl2 added was 8lbs. I sincerely doubt the manufacturer made a mixture of 7.19 lbs of CaCl2 and 0.91 lbs of YPS. The resulting mixture would have looked very yellow in color as YPS has a intense yellow color.

Now, could there be a mechanism where the resulting ferricyanide is reduced back to ferrocyanide by the following redox reaction -

[Fe(CN)6]3− + e ⇌ [Fe(CN)6]4− ......... Eo = +0.36mV vs. SHE

This could happen inside the SWG cell. In this case, a smaller amount of ferrocyanide would be needed and the constant redox reaction at the cell plate would look like an effective reduction in chlorine output. This would continue until all of the ferrocyanide is spent through the degradation of the iron-cyanide ligands which does happen when YPS is treated with a strong mineral acid. This would release toxic cyanide gas BUT, in the context of the concentrations found in a pool, I doubt the cyanide would have any impact on people as it would be microscopic quantities.

Also, sufficient amounts of YPS would also cause staining which we do see when people add salt to pools that has the YPS anti caking agent in it (Clorox Pool Salt was a bad actor for that problem).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JamesW
@revitup

Has your FC returned to normal and is your SWG producing the FC you expect it to?

Have you noticed any lingering effect after adding the CH increaser or is your system back to normal?
 
Now, could there be a mechanism where the resulting ferricyanide is reduced back to ferrocyanide by the following redox reaction
And, then that gets oxidized by the chlorine in an endless cycle until the it breaks down?

Hard to tell what is going on with the FC loss without better data.

The YPS reactions seem unlikely overall.

Maybe some other contaminants or maybe just test error or some other explanation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JoyfulNoise
@revitup

Has your FC returned to normal and is your SWG producing the FC you expect it to?

Have you noticed any lingering effect after adding the CH increaser or is your system back to normal?
Along with a couple of LC additions to get FC back up into my ‘comfort zone’ I’ve performed two OCLTs and passed both. FC is holding as it was before the mysterious FC crash indicating the SWG is holding FC as it was before. Same weather as before the ‘crash’, same bather load. All seems back to normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cowboycasey
Resurrecting this thread because I know you have all been waiting breathlessly for my FC test results after the latest calcium chloride addition. As happened the last time, FC crashed after the calcium chloride addition. FC had been rolling right along, consistently day after day, between 8-12. Check my logs. Added 6lbs calcium chloride yesterday with FC at 8.5. Today FC tested at 4.5. No other explanation, the tests do not lie. Calcium chloride additions are crashing FC.
 
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.