This phot clearly shows the tear is not on a seam. What I believe happened is that the chemical weakened the liner in the two spots, and then it perforated between the two weakened spots. The tear continued up the side because of the weight of the water. The chemical remained on the bottom because the concrete wall contained the spill and drained it out the drainage pipes down the hill.
- - - Updated - - -
The last three inches of water didn't drain and just had to evaporate away.
- - - Updated - - -
10,000 to replace the liner??
Do they have to tear/down rebuild the deck too for that price?
That seems WAY more than it should be.
That does not include tearing away the deck, which is not necessary. The liner is less than ten years old. My neighbor has had the same pool for over 15 years.
- - - Updated - - -
I was just asking for opinions on what others would ask for compensation. I am a pretty reasonable guy. I understand the computation for actual out of pocket expenses. Although factoring my pay at minimum wage would be ridiculous. There is also the issue of compensation for reduced use. Normally we would be swimming in our pool 3 to 4 times a day for an hour or so each time. Now are swimming is reduced to once per day. I think it would be fair to be compensated for that.
- - - Updated - - -
I too am not sure what I am looking at. If the pool let loose and failed with a quick drain I would think the CYA would have been washed away. This is just not adding up for me.
It was not a fast drain. The concrete block wall contained the spill and released it out several 4 inch drain pipes located in bottom of said wall.