New Owner, Old VERY Neglected Pool

Have you gotten all the debris out yet? There is no sense wasting your precious Liquid Cl on a bunch of branches, leaves and muck.
I do the best I can to get everything clean each time I go. The problem is that I can't see the bottom so even when I think I get it all I can't be sure. Today was the first time I vacuumed though and I feel like I got almost everything that could be got off the bottom without being able to see it. If I need to vaccuum to waste a few more times I will. With the skimmer running pretty well I feel like I'm getting new stuff fairly quickly and before it hits the bottom of the pool.
 
So before I really bought-in here on this forum I purchased some algaecide at the LPS that I now cannot return. I get that in a PROPERLY MAINTAINED POOL it's not needed, but this pool has been really neglected for so long... Since my pool is in such a bad state, what would be the downside of using this algaecide? I mean what could really be worse than it is now? Would it help me get over this hump and get to clear swimmable water faster?
 
Algaecides come in different formulations. They are not very good at killing algae but better at preventing algae.

The only algaecide endorsed by TFP is a Polyquat 60 used when winterizing pools.

It is likely your algaecide is either ammonia or copper based, or both, and you want neither of those in your pool.
 
Algaecides come in different formulations. They are not very good at killing algae but better at preventing algae.

The only algaecide endorsed by TFP is a Polyquat 60 used when winterizing pools.

It is likely your algaecide is either ammonia or copper based, or both, and you want neither of those in your pool.
I don't have the bottle on me presently but I'm 90% sure it's the one in the attached picture which is copper sulfate pentahydrate.
 

Attachments

  • ADC9EF43-852A-43C8-ADA7-A36C875B01A9.png
    ADC9EF43-852A-43C8-ADA7-A36C875B01A9.png
    559.7 KB · Views: 8

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
I used to use an algaecide on start up called "no more problems" its Bromine based.. It really messed up my pool chem and in the bigger picture I really didn't see the difference in just maintaining a slam .
My main goal is to get the pool to a swimmable state (without any major expenses like a pool liner) as fast as possible, with as few daily visits as can be managed. I don't mind spending a little extra time or money to get there faster so if there is something I can do to speed this up please let me know. Will dumping excess LC at night to get to higher than SLAM levels help speed this up? What else can I do to cut this process down to the minimum possible time?
 
Last edited:
Higher than SLAM levels are not going to help you much. Keeping the pool at SLAM levels and watching your pump pressure is the best approach. Do you have anybody else that can help check the pool when you can't? Keeping the FC up all the time and the filter at max efficiency is the quickest approach.

I know you can't see the bottom but if you still have stuff down there this is going to drag out. Is the water any clearer than you showed us last time?
 
Last edited:
Test results:
FC:19
CC:1.0
CYA:50


Vaccumed to waste, through the skimmer and pulled up about 3 skimmer baskets full of leaves and debris, and finally backwashed filter.

Added 1qt of LC to get to 20 slam level.

Attached are pictures. I'm going to start posting pics of the steps and the corners each time I go so we can all judge whether it's getting clearer.
 

Attachments

  • ADBB72EB-1BFD-4A6B-A7B2-C2B8E688504C.jpeg
    ADBB72EB-1BFD-4A6B-A7B2-C2B8E688504C.jpeg
    481 KB · Views: 61
  • 74C3722B-CEE7-4733-9D28-0E56EA88AA3D.jpeg
    74C3722B-CEE7-4733-9D28-0E56EA88AA3D.jpeg
    747.4 KB · Views: 60
  • AF9EECF3-F90D-4A55-B545-1159393BC14D.jpeg
    AF9EECF3-F90D-4A55-B545-1159393BC14D.jpeg
    435.9 KB · Views: 66
  • 8A436950-5139-4F96-800C-4395F3286255.jpeg
    8A436950-5139-4F96-800C-4395F3286255.jpeg
    585.1 KB · Views: 64
You are on the right track and the water does look clearer. Do you think you got it all or are you planning to vac to waste again?
I'm almost certain I didn't get it all. I can't possibly get everything when it's 10' underwater and hidden. I guess I'm confused on the SLAM process when applied to a neglected pool like this one. It seems the advice is to get the FC to a Max of the shock level and then keep it dosed every few hours so that it stays at or near that shock level. Why wouldn't I want to dose the pool so that the MINIMUM FC level is the shock level and that I'm dosing it to several ppm above that shock level every few hours. If I have this much algae wouldn't the extra FC simply go to killing it all that much faster?
 
You are correct that you want to stay at the minimum FC level if at all possible. I got the impression that you thought if 20 was the suggested level that a much much higher level would be better. It depends on your definition of much higher. At some point you reach the point of diminishing returns. At extremely high levels of FC your CYA fails to buffer it and the UV removes it very quickly. If that happens you just used a lot of chlorine for very little additional benefit. You also run the risk of damage to the liner if the level is too high.

We should probably get one of the chem experts to give you a better answer of how much is too much. You have a good grasp of the process and I probably read more into your statement than I should have.
 
Last edited:
You are correct that you want to stay at the minimum FC level if at all possible. I got the impression that you thought if 20 was the suggested level that a much much higher level would be better. It depends on your definition of much higher. At some point you reach the point of diminishing returns. At extremely high levels of FC your CYA fails to buffer it and the UV removes it very quickly. If that happens you just used a lot of chlorine for very little additional benefit. You also run the risk of damage to the liner if the level is too high.

We should probably get one of the chem experts to give you a better answer of how much is too much. You have a good grasp of the process and I probably read more into your statement than I should have.
Test results tonight after adding 2.5 gallons of bleach and removing the floating puck dispenser:

FC 32.5
CYA 60
pH 7.8

I'll check again and see how much chlorine it's eating overnight with no pucks in the floater
 

Attachments

  • 99B2C5CE-7F8A-484A-9229-69ABB78B1532.jpeg
    99B2C5CE-7F8A-484A-9229-69ABB78B1532.jpeg
    428.2 KB · Views: 45
  • D530DE55-E8E4-4ABA-879C-F1FC6662354A.jpeg
    D530DE55-E8E4-4ABA-879C-F1FC6662354A.jpeg
    789.4 KB · Views: 48
  • 5A28AAD6-DC7B-400C-B39D-3DA52B0C0D6E.jpeg
    5A28AAD6-DC7B-400C-B39D-3DA52B0C0D6E.jpeg
    570.6 KB · Views: 46
  • EBB7CD9A-2A14-46ED-93F6-82D8259FDFCC.jpeg
    EBB7CD9A-2A14-46ED-93F6-82D8259FDFCC.jpeg
    647.1 KB · Views: 48
  • CD37CBAD-1A49-4295-95C3-D384886A2839.jpeg
    CD37CBAD-1A49-4295-95C3-D384886A2839.jpeg
    578.5 KB · Views: 45
You should not raise your FC level above the SLAM level FC for your CYA. Doing so is a waste of chlorine and risks damage to your liner.

Even though, between your test and dose times, the FC level drops below the SLAM level, it is still killing the organics, albeit slower.

As your pool has not transitioned to a cloudy blue, I suspect you still have significant solid debris in the pool. The more you get that out, the faster the SLAM will proceed.
 
As your pool has not transitioned to a cloudy blue, I suspect you still have significant solid debris in the pool. The more you get that out, the faster the SLAM will proceed.

To be fair... it does look better than the last set of images posted. Progress is being made!

Consider that when you're cleaning the pool floor of debris, you're also swirling up what you're not getting out. Instead of one cleaning per visit, try vacuuming twice or more with a 10-15 minute waiting period in between to let the debris settle back down. And go very slow. Even the cleanest of pools will have debris that gets pushed around away from the vacuum head while vacuuming if you push it very fast at all. It's just easier to get when you can see it being pushed around and off the bottom.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.