Interesting issue with chalky residue on the gelcoat.
Karl, I saw CJ's post as well. There are other members who experienced the same issue where the white residue "wiped off" somewhat easily which is different than some pools (like mine) with a faded chalkiness that did not wipe off. For those shells with the chalkiness that wiped-off by hand, the increased CH, TA, and or pH seemed to resolve the issue. For the others (like mine), it did not. See
My Story Here. Seems to be different chemical/product/gelcoat issues as the chalkiness was definitely embedded and not something on the surface that could be wiped so easily. Some manufactures will claim it's an oxidation reaction from pool chemical maintenance, but that's an argument hard to prove or disclaim since some pool owners are very meticulous about their levels, while others not so much.
The reason TFP has always advocated a minimum CH was solely to prevent staining (i.e. colbalt, but others as well). It has been TFP's understanding based on replies from Lathum, San Juan, Viking, etc that calcium is no longer used in the manufacturing process of today's FG pools, therefore the CSI rule "shouldn't" really apply. But there does seem to be scenarios where chemicals allowed to stray too far outside the recommended ranges begin to impact the gelcoat, but we don't know exactly why. In some cases, we also believe defective gelcoat applications are also a possibility, in which case chemical level adjustments would have no bearing.
In short, I would refer to the TFP recommended levels and try to stay within those parameters. That's your safest bet to ensure the water is balanced properly, not only for algae prevention, but also to ensure the water is not too hard (scale) or aggressive.