Become a TFP Supporter Pool Math Forum Rules Pool School
Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Help with Taylor K2006 PH test

  1. Back To Top    #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    N.E. South Carolina
    Posts
    68

    Help with Taylor K2006 PH test

    I could swear I saw someone with this same problem, but maybe it was over at the PF site? Anyway, everytime I do a PH test, I get a different reading if I do it twice. For a while I was testing FC first, then PH, and that's when I noticed the problem. Then I thought, maybe I'm not rinsing well enough. So I am now doing the PH test first, but it still does it. The first test is ALWAYS lower. For instance today, first test was 7.2, then did it again and got 7.6. A couple of times it was 7.0-7.2ish the first time, and 7.8 -8.0ish the second time, which is WAY different! I'm trying to figure out if it could be the dropper tip, but it really doesn't look like the drops are a different size.

    By the way, if I do it a third time, I get whatever was on the second test, so I'm assuming the first test is incorrect.

    Anyone else having this problem? Should order a different reagent bottle?
    Judy

    Designated "pool girl" for 18' x 40' in-ground vinyl pool built in 2006

  2. Back To Top    #2
    KurtV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SE Louisiana
    Posts
    270

    Re: Help with Taylor K2006 PH test

    Assuming your'e rinsing the comparator tube well, the results of an earlier test can't affect a subsequent one.

    My guess is that the drops are not precisely the same size. Try wiping the tip of the reagent bottle before each drop.

  3. Back To Top    #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Rafael, CA USA
    Posts
    12,085
    For the pH test, the drop size shouldn't matter very much since the test compares color hue, not intensity. However, contamination on the dropper could certainly influence the pH, but it would have to be something pretty strong which seems unlikely.

    There have been 2 (one on the PoolForum) reports of this varying pH problem with the first test being the one that is different from subsequent tests. I don't know what is going on, but will describe what I do and I'll have to test multiple times to see if I get any variation (I think I've done that a few times and don't recall any variation). Whenever I take a pool water sample, I flip the comparator tube upside down and put my hand about a foot or so (probably 18") below the water surface and then flip the tube so it becomes upright and fills with water. I then take the comparator out (now filled with water), then invert it and dump the water back into the pool. Then I go down again (inverted) and repeat to get a water sample. This sample is the one I then spill out excess into the pool (to get to the appropriate line, which for pH is the 44 ml line near the top). I cap the tube (which I rinse in the pool water first) and then take it back for measurement, adding the 5 drops, capping, inverting a few times, then looking at the color. After I'm done with the test, I dump the sample into the sink and rinse out both the tube and the cap with filtered water (though tap water should be fine -- we just happen to have a filtered water faucet at the kitchen sink where I do my tests so I use it).

    If the sample is shaken instead of inverted, then it's possible for the aeration to make the pH rise a little. That's one possibility, though doesn't explain why only the first sample is off. It could be that though the tube is cleaned, the cap is not. That would tend to make the first sample bad if the previous test was not a pH test.
    16,000 gallon outdoor in-ground 16'x32' plaster pool; Pentair Intelliflo VF pump; Pentair IntelliTouch i9+3s control system; Jandy CL-340 square foot cartridge filter
    12 Fafco solar panels; Purex Triton PowerMax 250 natural gas heater (200,000 BTU/hr output); automatic electric pool safety cover; 4-wheel pressure-side "The Pool Cleaner"

  4. Back To Top    #4

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    278
    After reading your post a few times it sounds like a reagent delivery problem..Moste dripper bottles are desigined to deliver 50 microleters per drip..I have mesured it here and the lab using a scale and found they will have about a 2 to 5 microleter varance when the bottle is held verical while having a 10 to 12 microleter varance when not held verticle. When you take in to account that it takes 5 drops there is a mesureable diffrence.
    Steve
    Echo Canyon II by Artesian Pools, 13.5 KGal AG Round, 22" Artesian Sand Filter 2 hp Artesian pump
    Med Lab Tech for 12 years in E.TN
    Chem testing by Trouble Free Test Kits

  5. Back To Top    #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Rafael, CA USA
    Posts
    12,085
    I can understand the difference in volume affecting the drop counting tests, like FC, CC, TA and CH, but would that really affect the pH test that much since it is mostly looking for a comparison of hue and not intensity (saturation)? I suppose one can just add 2-3 drops and see what it looks like compared to 5 drops and 7-8 drops. If they come out similar in color hue, then the problem isn't the drop size.
    16,000 gallon outdoor in-ground 16'x32' plaster pool; Pentair Intelliflo VF pump; Pentair IntelliTouch i9+3s control system; Jandy CL-340 square foot cartridge filter
    12 Fafco solar panels; Purex Triton PowerMax 250 natural gas heater (200,000 BTU/hr output); automatic electric pool safety cover; 4-wheel pressure-side "The Pool Cleaner"

  6. Back To Top    #6

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    278
    I just tested with a HTH ph kit that uses 9.5 ml for sample and an Aquatrend test kit that uses 44 ml for testing. I grabbed some water from our DI water source at work and adjusted the pH to 7.4 and brought it home. I then tested with rinse between tests adding a drop at a time in each kit. This made for a total of 8 runs between each methodology.
    The HTH kit showed some variance from one drop to the next in color intensity witch could be mistaken for different pH results.
    The Aquatrend showed even more variance due to the greater dilution on the test reagent.
    I feel that small variances with in test drop delivery can change the test results on the colorimetric testing mythologies due to prozone effect. The prozone is the concretion of reagent to sample volume that matches the color slides we use for comparison. After reading on Taylor’s site they also recommend to hold the bottles vertical to get greater precision for with in run testing.
    Steve
    Echo Canyon II by Artesian Pools, 13.5 KGal AG Round, 22" Artesian Sand Filter 2 hp Artesian pump
    Med Lab Tech for 12 years in E.TN
    Chem testing by Trouble Free Test Kits

  7. Back To Top    #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Rafael, CA USA
    Posts
    12,085
    Thanks for doing the experiment. My hunch was wrong in this case. At least we now know that drop size and number of drops are important for this test.
    16,000 gallon outdoor in-ground 16'x32' plaster pool; Pentair Intelliflo VF pump; Pentair IntelliTouch i9+3s control system; Jandy CL-340 square foot cartridge filter
    12 Fafco solar panels; Purex Triton PowerMax 250 natural gas heater (200,000 BTU/hr output); automatic electric pool safety cover; 4-wheel pressure-side "The Pool Cleaner"

  8. Back To Top    #8
    KurtV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SE Louisiana
    Posts
    270
    Ockham's Razor...

  9. Back To Top    #9

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by KurtV
    Ockham's Razor...
    I was thinking along the same lines until I read chemgeeks post. I respect his opinion and he is an top notch theory chemist but we have disagreed more than once when it comes to real world chemistry. I do lab testing for a living and had to disagree this time.
    Steve
    Echo Canyon II by Artesian Pools, 13.5 KGal AG Round, 22" Artesian Sand Filter 2 hp Artesian pump
    Med Lab Tech for 12 years in E.TN
    Chem testing by Trouble Free Test Kits

  10. Back To Top    #10
    KurtV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    SE Louisiana
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by medvampire
    Quote Originally Posted by KurtV
    Ockham's Razor...
    I was thinking along the same lines until I read chemgeeks post. I respect his opinion and he is an top notch theory chemist but we have disagreed more than once when it comes to real world chemistry. I do lab testing for a living and had to disagree this time.
    Steve
    My post was in no way directed at Richard. I always find his posts insightful and made in a spirit of elightment and/or inquiry.

  11. Back To Top    #11

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    East Tennessee
    Posts
    278
    Quote Originally Posted by KurtV
    My post was in no way directed at Richard. I always find his posts insightful and made in a spirit of elightment and inquiry.
    I understood and I am shure Richard understands it wasnt directed at anyone...I diidnt mean it to sound that way.
    Steve
    Echo Canyon II by Artesian Pools, 13.5 KGal AG Round, 22" Artesian Sand Filter 2 hp Artesian pump
    Med Lab Tech for 12 years in E.TN
    Chem testing by Trouble Free Test Kits

  12. Back To Top    #12

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    San Rafael, CA USA
    Posts
    12,085
    No offense was taken and for the record, I'm not a chemist. A chemistry geek/nerd, maybe. This is why we have forums and multiple users. None of us gets it all right all the time. It's through joint efforts and matching theory and knowledge with experience that we get to models that help us predict and control our future.
    16,000 gallon outdoor in-ground 16'x32' plaster pool; Pentair Intelliflo VF pump; Pentair IntelliTouch i9+3s control system; Jandy CL-340 square foot cartridge filter
    12 Fafco solar panels; Purex Triton PowerMax 250 natural gas heater (200,000 BTU/hr output); automatic electric pool safety cover; 4-wheel pressure-side "The Pool Cleaner"

  13. Back To Top    #13
    Mod Squad JohnT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    SW Indiana
    Posts
    8,617
    I played around with my Taylor pH test tonight while checking the pool. Here's what I did:

    Normal test as per instructions: pH 7.2
    Repeated without rinsing test vialH 7.2
    Added an extra dropH 7.2 (slightly more color, but no way it could be confused for another shade)
    Rinsed and tested with 4 dropsH 7.2 (slightly less color, .....)

    No way could I have been fooled by a reagent volume error of +/- 1 drop or less. I can't say that other people might not have been fooled. If it was between two colors, darkening or lightening the solution MIGHT have led me to guesstimate the wrong way.

    Just another data point.
    TFP Moderator
    20K Gallon 20X36 Vinyl Inground
    Hayward S244T Sand Filter with 1HP Whisperflo Pump. Liquidator C-201 and Solar Heat

  14. Back To Top    #14
    I have read the instructions that came with my test kit and it states to hold the bottle vertical. At first, I was holding the sample bottle and swirling it vertically. After doing the test a couple of times I figured they meant the regeant bottle because I noticed the drops were not consistent and in fact sometimes the first drop had an air bubble. So, I came up with some kind of process to test my water. Can some one please chime in and correct me if what I am doing is wrong. Maybe this might help other newbies.

    When doing multiple tests I use one of the sample bottles that my local pool store hands out, this way I don't have to keep sticking my hand in everytime and when I empty water from the collector tubes to get the correct volume I usually over do it and have to start over.

    First, I take the sample bottle and go to the deep end, stick the bottle upside down about 18-20 inches below the water surface and invert the bottle, which fills up, I then empty and repeat keeping the second sample. I then go over to my patio table with all of my test chemicals and follow all the instructions making sure to swirl the sample while holding the reagent bottle vertical. After each test I use the same pool water from my sample bottle and rinse. I do use the caps that were provide for the OTO tests, CYA and shake to mix, I only swirl when adding chemicals that are supposed to change colors.
    20x40 24,000 gal IG plaster/CircuPool RJ45 SWG/2 skimmer/2sp 2.5hp Jandy Stealth/340sq ft cart filter/600sqftHeliocol Solar Panels/6ft semi circlr tanning ledge/25ft deep end bench/5ft sheer descent/2 lion head water features/1300sqft travertine paver/2 Colorlogic lights/Hayward Navigator/3step 2ft raised bond beam

  15. Back To Top    #15
    DONNIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    122
    Go to a beauty supply store and you can get a really good plastic applicator bottle with a cap. You can get all the water you need to do a full series of tests and it has a cap to prevent outgassing between your tests (someone said that was important). Works great for me.

    Donnie
    8500 Gallon Fiberglass IG / Sta-Rite pump,cartridge filter & heater / PoolPilot Dig 220-36 SWG / Testing w/K2006

  16. Back To Top    #16

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Richmond, Va
    Posts
    179
    That's what they were doing at the pool store I was at yesterday. They took my water and placed in a plastic bottle with a long tip and it was like they were syringing water into individual testing tubes from that.
    18 ft.52" Round Atrium AG -7600 gallons, Sand Filter, Vinyl liner, Royal Entrance Steps, 80 lbs.solarsalt

  17. Back To Top    #17
    DONNIE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    OKLAHOMA
    Posts
    122
    Only way to go.
    8500 Gallon Fiberglass IG / Sta-Rite pump,cartridge filter & heater / PoolPilot Dig 220-36 SWG / Testing w/K2006

  18. Back To Top    #18
    Guest
    If you are doing a test that is NOT a titration test (drop count test) then cap the vial and invert it 2 or 3 times to mix it....don't shake it. If you are doing a titration test then you want to swirls for about 10 seconds between drops (30 seconds for the calcium hardness test--this test can take a while if you are doing it right and your calcium is high. I have been doing this test for MANY MANY years. It is also used in salt water aquarium keeping and I've been doing THAT for over 30 years now!) For the CYA test you do want to shake it hard, then let it sit for about 3-5 minutes, then shake again before dispensing into the view tube.

    For titration tests you want to keep adding drops until the last drop added does not produce any color change. For example let's use the TA test. You added 10 drop and the indicator turns red. You add an 11th drop and it gets redder. You add a 12th drop and there is no color change. Your endpoint is 11 drops (110 ppm Total Alkalinity).

    NOTE THAT SOME TESTS MIGHT NOT FOLLOW THIS. THE SALT TEST IS AT ENDPOINT WHEN THE COLOR FIRST CHANGES TO REDDISH ORANGE AND THE COLOR HOLDS (DOESN'T DISAPPEAR IMMEDIATELY). IF YOU CONTINUE THE COLOR WILL STILL CHANGE TO A BROWNISH RED COLOR AND YOU HAVE GONE TOO FAR.

  19. Back To Top    #19

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Wyoming, Michigan
    Posts
    93
    Quote Originally Posted by waterbear
    If you are doing a titration test then you want to swirls for about 10 seconds between drops (30 seconds for the calcium hardness test--this test can take a while if you are doing it right and your calcium is high.
    You're talking 20 minutes to do a test if you're CH is 400. Do you really wait this long? Is the long delay between drops because swirling is an ineffective method of mixing, or because it takes that long for the reagent to properly interact with the liquid under test?

    I've seen a unit down at my local Leslie's that has a pill shaped piece that's dropped into the test vial and then rotated by a magnet underneath the test vial for mixing purposes. Would using something like this allow the test to be sped up, or is the 30 seconds between drops still required? Does anyone know if units like these are available for the average consumer?

  20. Back To Top    #20
    Guest
    You are tallking about a magnetic stirrer. It is a standard piece of laboratory equipment ( and was an option on some top of the line stoves and cooktops in the 60's!) You can pick one up for under $100 at most laboratory supply companies. They will speed things up a bit but even with a stirrer and a burette to dispense the reagent the drops should not come that fast. Hand swirling is much more inefficient which is why I suggest swirling for 30 seconds. It does take a bit of time for each drop of titrant to react with the calcium in the water. The calcium hardness test is not a fast test. It does take a bit of time, but then again, it's really only necessary to do it maybe once a month since it doesn't change that fast if you pool stays balanced. A magnetic stirrer will mix the reagent more quickly and the drops can be added about 3-5 seconds apart in that case. I know that I might get some people disagreeing with me on this test but I do have many years experience with it using tests from several different companies and doing it this way will give reproducable results.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •