I am having a pool installed now, but I have a filter question. We are installing a very large (52' x 24') pool. The 48K gal volume is a bit less than you might think because we have a big wet deck in the shallow end and there is a 2' wide shelf running down the length on one side that is the same level as the wet deck. Everything will be plumbed with relatively large caliber: there are going to be 3 runs with 2" (2 skimmers and 1 combined drain) to the pad and a single 2.5" or possibly 2 x 2" parallel return to the pool (T's into a 2" loop around the entire pool from which there are 4 jets/ports, one on each side about 4' from corners to hopefully encourage some circulation -- PB's design and we'll see about the circulation). We are also planning on 6-8 deck jets (not yet installed) that will also flow from a 2" loop around the pool to help balance the flow from each jet. The pad is about 20' from the pool with no elevation change.
I was planning on the IntelliFlo VS pump, likely the 2 hp. We will have a NG heater which will be bypassable; my pool builder is a Pentair guy so it will be a Pentair heater. We're going to do a salt chlorinating system also.
I have a filter question:
For simplicity we have been planning on doing cartridge. What does the board think about the Clean & Clear Plus 520 or 420 vs having 2 Clean & Clear RP 200's in parallel? Price seems roundly ballpark for these 2 options. I am looking for ease of managing, cleaning, etc. I could accommodate either option space-wise. The Clean and Clear RP's tout decreased resistance, so I started thinking about the parallel option. Thoughts? I guess I am more asking if the CCRP filter benefits are just hype. When I look at the table on the Hydraulics 101 page and I calculate the flow rate I will need given my pool size, having 2 CCRP's in parallel looks like a lot less head loss. However, I don't know what models that table on the Hydraulics 101 used and it could be that the 420 or 520 has much less head loss then what is in that table.
Also, I would assume the pressure gauges in that situation should read the same. Any other potential issues you can foresee? Which setup would be easier for filter cleaning?
Thanks experts!
I was planning on the IntelliFlo VS pump, likely the 2 hp. We will have a NG heater which will be bypassable; my pool builder is a Pentair guy so it will be a Pentair heater. We're going to do a salt chlorinating system also.
I have a filter question:
For simplicity we have been planning on doing cartridge. What does the board think about the Clean & Clear Plus 520 or 420 vs having 2 Clean & Clear RP 200's in parallel? Price seems roundly ballpark for these 2 options. I am looking for ease of managing, cleaning, etc. I could accommodate either option space-wise. The Clean and Clear RP's tout decreased resistance, so I started thinking about the parallel option. Thoughts? I guess I am more asking if the CCRP filter benefits are just hype. When I look at the table on the Hydraulics 101 page and I calculate the flow rate I will need given my pool size, having 2 CCRP's in parallel looks like a lot less head loss. However, I don't know what models that table on the Hydraulics 101 used and it could be that the 420 or 520 has much less head loss then what is in that table.
Also, I would assume the pressure gauges in that situation should read the same. Any other potential issues you can foresee? Which setup would be easier for filter cleaning?
Thanks experts!