Installed New Circupool Edge 40

On my 220 vs 110 for SWG question, not sure if this matters, but I do plan on running pump & SWG for at least 16 hrs because we like to keep a solar cover on for 24x7 in the spring time to help get the water temps up and I find with solar cover on that long the added circulation time helps. SWG will be set at about 20%
 
I understand that 220 is "more efficient" than 110, BUT is that really a practical difference. I ask because installing a CircuPool RJ45+ this week-end and I understand I can power this at 220 OR 110. If the 220 vs 110 effeciency isn't really material than I may choose 110 as the 110 timers are much cheaper than the 220 and also the 110 option could include some wifi type plugs as an option for my wiring task. Not sure yet if I want to go mechanical timer or wifi timer as there are some pro's / con's on that choice as well.

220V vs. 100V for a SWG makes no difference. Supporting dual voltage is a convenience for pool panels that are only wired for 220V. A SWG is a low power device unlike a pool pump where the pump can be more powerful with 220V vs 110V. Wire your SWG for 120V if you have it.
 
220V vs. 100V for a SWG makes no difference
I thought it was for ease of matching the pump breaker(s). 2 legs for 220v pump, one for 110v. Either one of them is overkill once it’s stepped down to 30something volts DC.
 
I thought it was for ease of matching the pump breaker(s). 2 legs for 220v pump, one for 110v. Either one of them is overkill once it’s stepped down to 30something volts DC.

Not sure what you are saying. No reason to "match" the pump breaker for the SWG.

In some panels or pump timer wired for only 220V you don't find a neutral wire to hookup a 120V circuit.
 
Not sure what you are saying. No reason to "match" the pump breaker for the SWG
For the cases where they are wired together at the same breaker. It keeps both legs balanced to wire the SWG to the 220 breaker for the pump. Otherwise one leg of the 220 pump would have extra draw on it, probably tripping the GFI.
 
For the cases where they are wired together at the same breaker. It keeps both legs balanced to wire the SWG to the 220 breaker for the pump. Otherwise one leg of the 220 pump would have extra draw on it, probably tripping the GFI.

If the breaker is a 240V GFCI breaker and you try and connect one hot leg to both a pump and a SWG and the other breaker hot goes to the pump for 240V and the SWG connects to a neutral for 120V the GFCI will immediately trip. That type of "technique" could be done before GFCI breakers. The 120V connection will not be properly GFCI monitored with that type of wiring.

You need one 240V GFCI CB for the pump and a separate 120V GFCI for the SWG. Then all legs are properly GFCI monitored.
 
You need one 240V GFCI CB for the pump and a separate 120V GFCI for the SWG. Then all legs are properly GFCI monitored
But then when the pump trips it’s own breaker, either through a fault or the stupid VS on a non Siemens breaker nonsense, the SWG still has power and has to rely on the flow switch to turn off. With both my SWG and Pump tied together (as 220v) when the pump trips the breaker the SWG gets cut also.
 
But then when the pump trips it’s own breaker, either through a fault or the stupid VS on a non Siemens breaker nonsense, the SWG still has power and has to rely on the flow switch to turn off. With both my SWG and Pump tied together (as 220v) when the pump trips the breaker the SWG gets cut also.

True. That's why the SWG has the flow switch as a secondary safety for times like that. That is a rare occurrence.
 
I understand that 220 is "more efficient" than 110, BUT is that really a practical difference. I ask because installing a CircuPool RJ45+ this week-end and I understand I can power this at 220 OR 110. If the 220 vs 110 effeciency isn't really material than I may choose 110 as the 110 timers are much cheaper than the 220 and also the 110 option could include some wifi type plugs as an option for my wiring task. Not sure yet if I want to go mechanical timer or wifi timer as there are some pro's / con's on that choice as well.
It shouldn't matter one bit for something like a salt chlorine generator. It does on motors and pumps because of their high current draw when on 110V. Do whatever is convenient to you. If/when I get one I may run it on 110V just because it would be easier to monitor for ground faults with a 110V interrupter than a 220V GFCI circuit breaker. Like I'd put it on it's own GFCI....
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
That is a rare occurrence.
I have the non VS friendly breaker problem. When it’s acting up it can be a few times a week. Everytime I say it’s finally worth the $100 fix, it stops for 2 months. Lol.
 
I have sometimes wondered about two flow switches with these units rather than a timer. I am sure I am not thinking of something though. It's a Darn shame that the (ripoff, IMHO. Yes all of the big three pool manufacturers) pump manufacturers don't have an output signal on the VS pumps, and you have to kludge up a timer to hook a non-automated cell up....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newdude
(ripoff, IMHO. Yes all of the big three pool manufacturers) pump manufacturers don't have an output signal on the VS pumps, and you have to kludge up a timer to hook a non-automated cell up
They get to keep the price down and blame it on the electrician instead. Kinda like when the capacitor blew on my sprinkler pump. The plumbing supply stores didn’t have it because it was an electrical part, and the electric supply stores didn’t have it because it was a plumbing problem. I had to get it from the HVAC supply place because they had ones for central ACs that were within the tolerance to work (+/- 5% )
 
A lot of Ace Hardware stores also have oil filled motor caps as well, as does Amazon and the normal electrical supply stores like Digi-Key, Mouser, Newark. For future reference.

I think it's to sell automation equipment rather than a cost issue. They do have relay inputs on those pumps, after all. Maybe the salt cell people should design in a high/med/low output from their controller to run the pump instead....
 
A lot of Ace Hardware stores also have oil filled motor caps as well, as does Amazon and the normal electrical supply stores like Digi-Key, Mouser, Newark. For future reference
Dually noted if the need arises again. At the time 4 years ago, the only one online that fit my old irrigation pump was from China with 1 month shipping @ $30. Ouch.
 
I use this current sensing device, (CR4395-EH-120-110-X-CD-ELR-I). It senses current on one of the pump's 220v lines and switches 120V to my SWCG. When the pump isn't turning there is no power to the SWCG. Current trip point is adjustable. If you don't have 120 available there is a version that can switch 220V (see the second page of the above link). Its a device used in industrial application for motor control and monitoring. Just need to mount it in a box (weatherproof if install is outdoors), make some twist nut connections along with crimping four disconnect terminals. In my opinion is is comparable in cost and installation ease to a timer
IMG_0352.png
 
As you can see Atlanta is in Yellow pollen season which is one reason I wanted to mount it inside a room. Its an open air room but in the shade so stays cooler
I like the edge, I have a 20K pool and running it at 1/3 power ( I run my pump at 2100 rpm 24x7 ) it keep my FC at 5 or 6..But still watching and adjusting down as needed

Also were others have said their runs through a 180 minute cycle this one seems to work a little different. My smart plug measures amps/watts and as I increase the power the amps go up but it never stops running.
Where I have it set now it's using around 78 watts.
I asked and was pretty much told " don't worry about it, set and let it run" Guess they don't understand my brain , sometimes I don't either :)
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
Thread Status
Hello , This thread has been inactive for over 60 days. New postings here are unlikely to be seen or responded to by other members. For better visibility, consider Starting A New Thread.