It is currently February 4th, 2012, 2:15 am



 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: UV pool Sanitizer vs. SWG?
PostPosted: April 22nd, 2009, 8:45 am 
New User

Joined: April 22nd, 2009, 8:29 am
Posts: 1
Topic split off from this thread: uv-pool-sanitizer-t10552.html (FPM)

UV treatment versus salt water systems for pools........what are the pro's and con's of each?

Thanks


Last edited by frustratedpoolmom on April 22nd, 2009, 8:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Hijack


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UV pool Sanitizer vs. SWG?
PostPosted: April 22nd, 2009, 9:36 am 
Special Contributor
Special Contributor
User avatar

Joined: October 12th, 2008, 10:42 am
Posts: 1377
Location: Hillsborough, NC
People who sell SWG's are pros, and people who sell UV's are cons. :mrgreen:

UV only destroys what's in the chamber, leaving no residual in the water. That means anything that accumulates in the pool and doesn't pass through the filtration system will not be affected, and anything that DOES get filtered only gets treated once per turnover. It also means that it does nothing to prevent P2P transmission of disease in the pool.

SWG's are a way of producing chlorine, which when used properly builds up a residual in the water and does it's killing all over the place, not just in a tube near your filter. Cons of SWG's vs. regular chlorine use are the initial upfront investment, replacement cost of the cell, upward pH drift, and in cases where there's not a lot of rain (indoors or dry climates) splashed out water evaporates and leaves salt behind which can corrode unsealed stone. You'll also see oxidation on non-bonded equipment like lights and ladder rails, but IMO that's a problem with the bonding, not the SWG.

You can completely sanitize your pool with a SWG. A UV system is supplemental at best.


Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UV pool Sanitizer vs. SWG?
PostPosted: April 22nd, 2009, 9:41 am 
Site Admin
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: May 7th, 2007, 3:03 pm
Posts: 22087
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Welcome to TFP!

UV is never acceptable on it's own. UV is only suitable as an adjunct to one of the three primary sanitizers: chlorine, bromine, or baquacil.

A SWG is probably the best all around choice available for pools. Bromine is usually the best for spas.

UV, in combination with a sanitizer, is very nice for use with an indoor pool. UV can take care of the CC which tends to build up in indoor pools. UV is not worth it for an outdoor pool, where sunlight performs the same function for free.



_________________
19K gal, vinyl, 1/2 HP WhisperFlo pump, 200 sqft cartridge filter, AutoPilot Digital SWG, Dolphin Dynamic cleaning robot
TFP Admin. Creator of The Pool Calculator. Other handy links: Support this site, TF Test Kits, Pool School
Offline
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: UV pool Sanitizer vs. SWG?
PostPosted: April 22nd, 2009, 11:06 am 
spishex wrote:
People who sell SWG's are pros, and people who sell UV's are cons. :mrgreen:


ROFLMAO!!!!

Alan, perhaps this thread will help you:
alternative-sanitizers-and-chemical-free-pools-the-truth-t3025.html


  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 Page 1 of 1 [ 4 posts ] 


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  


TroubleFreePool.com The Web