ummgood, That's very smart on your part, and yes, a statement in writing ensuring payment was received would be an excellent practice for anyone to get into the habit of doing when a middleman is involved.
I suspect that the way you pay them is how the woman in the news story did too. Or at least that's how I interpreted this statement: "She said they paid Bellar Pools nearly $40,000 for the work that was done" But even though she paid for that work, with the contractor still failing to pay the subcontractor then she is stuck being responsible for paying the sub. Even though she paid in that way, instead of the entire job all at once etc., had she requested a statement of payment from the subcontractor, it in her case, wouldn't have made any difference because she didn't pay out any more money after that payment, and as soon as her money hit the contractor's hand he, along with her 40K, were both long gone already.
I suspect that the way you pay them is how the woman in the news story did too. Or at least that's how I interpreted this statement: "She said they paid Bellar Pools nearly $40,000 for the work that was done" But even though she paid for that work, with the contractor still failing to pay the subcontractor then she is stuck being responsible for paying the sub. Even though she paid in that way, instead of the entire job all at once etc., had she requested a statement of payment from the subcontractor, it in her case, wouldn't have made any difference because she didn't pay out any more money after that payment, and as soon as her money hit the contractor's hand he, along with her 40K, were both long gone already.