|
It is currently May 25th, 2012, 6:20 pm
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
jeeman
|
Post subject: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 2:04 pm |
Joined: June 3rd, 2010, 2:03 pm Posts: 31
|
|
I know that you want to get an SWG that is about twice the size. My pool is 15k gallons and I'm leaning towards the Circupool RJ-30. But the RJ-45 is just $75 more.
So, does that mean I can run the RJ-45 at a lower % and thus a lower wattage? Will the cell last longer than the RJ-30? I know that these are rated for a certain number of hours, but is that a certain number of hours at 100%?
Thanks, all! I love this forum!
Jeeman
_________________ ~13X42 irregular sized 17k gallon IG pool, with jacuzzi. Pentair Intelliflo VF pump, Purex Triton DE filter (48 sqft), Pentair heater. BBB method, although I'm really only good at one B (bleach).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
svenpup
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 3:30 pm |
| Lifetime Supporter |
 |
 |
Joined: November 18th, 2009, 6:21 pm Posts: 562 Location: Sacramento, CA
|
|
The way the the % works is it cycles on and off like a microwave oven, not lowering the wattage. I doubt you will save electricity going to the larger cell, but the cell will last longer. The only real problem with going too big is that you lose granularity of control. Imagine that you are set to 5% and it is too much, but 4% is too low. If you cell was half the size this would equate to 10% and 8%, so you could set it to 9%.
_________________ TFP Method Advanced Beginner
17,500 gallons - In Ground - Plaster - Hayward Swimclear 3020 Cartridge Filter - Sta-Rite Max-E-Glas Main Pump upgraded with A.O. Smith B2980 E-Plus New Centurion Two-Speed Motor - Polaris 280 Cleaner with Polaris PB4-60 Booster Pump - TightWatt2 Timer - Taylor K-2006 Test Kit - Pool Pilot Digital Nano SWCG Helpful Links: Pool School, BBB for Beginners, How to Shock (hint...it's a process not a product), Chlorine/CYA Chart, Jason's Pool Calculator
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jeeman
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 5:52 pm |
Joined: June 3rd, 2010, 2:03 pm Posts: 31
|
Strannik wrote: the cells are usually rated at 100% output so if you run it at 50% the life will be longer
the SWG itself doesn't consume much electricity, so there isn't much saving there.
where you save with bigger unit is pump run time. pumps usually consume much more than SWG does.
so with bigger unit you can run your pump less. Strannik, good point. I have the Intelliflo VF, so my runtime is always going to be more than the SWG, so no savings there. BTW, is there a minimum flow that any SWG needs? I always have mine running between 15-17gpm. Jeeman
_________________ ~13X42 irregular sized 17k gallon IG pool, with jacuzzi. Pentair Intelliflo VF pump, Purex Triton DE filter (48 sqft), Pentair heater. BBB method, although I'm really only good at one B (bleach).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
JasonLion
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 5:54 pm |
| Site Admin |
 |
 |
Joined: May 7th, 2007, 3:03 pm Posts: 23820 Location: Silver Spring, MD
|
Strannik wrote: the cells are usually rated at 100% output so if you run it at 50% the life will be longer While totally true, I don't feel this captures what is really happening. Cell life time can be thought of as producing some fixed total amount of chlorine over the life of the cell. If you buy a cell that is twice as large, it will produce twice as much chlorine in it's lifetime. Since you will actually adjust it to produce chlorine at the same rate, the pools needs some constant amount of chlorine/day regardless of cell size, the twice as large cell will last twice as long. Yes, there is a minimum flow rate. It varies by brand/model. Typical flow requirements are between 15 and 40 GPM, depending on brand/model.
_________________ 19K gal, vinyl, 1/2 HP WhisperFlo pump, 200 sqft cartridge filter, AutoPilot Digital SWG, Dolphin Dynamic cleaning robot TFP Admin. Creator of The Pool Calculator. Other handy links: Support this site, TF Test Kits, Pool School
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jeeman
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 5:57 pm |
Joined: June 3rd, 2010, 2:03 pm Posts: 31
|
Strannik wrote: the cells are usually rated at 100% output so if you run it at 50% the life will be longer
the SWG itself doesn't consume much electricity, so there isn't much saving there.
where you save with bigger unit is pump run time. pumps usually consume much more than SWG does.
so with bigger unit you can run your pump less. So then, for a 15k gallon pool, is it safe to say that an SWG for 20k gallons can be run about 100% for 3 years, an SWG for 30k gallons can be run at 50% for roughly 5-6 years, and an SWG for 45k gallons can be run at 33% for roughly around 8-9 years? I'm guessing the math doesn't work like that? Probably more like an extra year for each 15k gallon jump in size? Jeeman
_________________ ~13X42 irregular sized 17k gallon IG pool, with jacuzzi. Pentair Intelliflo VF pump, Purex Triton DE filter (48 sqft), Pentair heater. BBB method, although I'm really only good at one B (bleach).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jeeman
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 5:59 pm |
Joined: June 3rd, 2010, 2:03 pm Posts: 31
|
JasonLion wrote: Strannik wrote: the cells are usually rated at 100% output so if you run it at 50% the life will be longer While totally true, I don't feel this captures what is really happening. Cell life time can be thought of as producing some fixed total amount of chlorine over the life of the cell. If you buy a cell that is twice as large, it will produce twice as much chlorine in it's lifetime. Since you will actually adjust it to produce chlorine at the same rate, the pools needs some constant amount of chlorine/day regardless of cell size, the twice as large cell will last twice as long. Yes, there is a minimum flow rate. It varies by brand/model. Typical flow requirements are between 15 and 40 GPM, depending on brand/model. Jason, Thanks for the post. It seems like the RJ 45 may be the way to go, for $100 more, even though I may lose some granularity of output. I don't think that will be a problem with the way the SoCal sun burns my chlorine away! Jeeman
_________________ ~13X42 irregular sized 17k gallon IG pool, with jacuzzi. Pentair Intelliflo VF pump, Purex Triton DE filter (48 sqft), Pentair heater. BBB method, although I'm really only good at one B (bleach).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jparr
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 6:01 pm |
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:34 pm Posts: 55
|
svenpup wrote: The way the the % works is it cycles on and off like a microwave oven, not lowering the wattage. I doubt you will save electricity going to the larger cell, but the cell will last longer. The only real problem with going too big is that you lose granularity of control. Imagine that you are set to 5% and it is too much, but 4% is too low. If you cell was half the size this would equate to 10% and 8%, so you could set it to 9%. My CircuPool unit appears to be varying the voltage depending on the output percentage. The cloudiness of the water leaving the cell gets heavier when the output is set higher, and I have never seen it not producing chlorine even when set to 40%.
_________________ 17,000 Gallon plaster pool. Hayward Perflex EC65 DE Filter. 3/4 HP Hayward Superpump. CircuPool RJ45. Skimmer, floor drain, two returns.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jeeman
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 6:11 pm |
Joined: June 3rd, 2010, 2:03 pm Posts: 31
|
jparr wrote: svenpup wrote: The way the the % works is it cycles on and off like a microwave oven, not lowering the wattage. I doubt you will save electricity going to the larger cell, but the cell will last longer. The only real problem with going too big is that you lose granularity of control. Imagine that you are set to 5% and it is too much, but 4% is too low. If you cell was half the size this would equate to 10% and 8%, so you could set it to 9%. My CircuPool unit appears to be varying the voltage depending on the output percentage. The cloudiness of the water leaving the cell gets heavier when the output is set higher, and I have never seen it not producing chlorine even when set to 40%. jparr, Your setup looks similar to what mine would be. What percentage do you run yours at? What FC do you maintain? Jeeman
_________________ ~13X42 irregular sized 17k gallon IG pool, with jacuzzi. Pentair Intelliflo VF pump, Purex Triton DE filter (48 sqft), Pentair heater. BBB method, although I'm really only good at one B (bleach).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jparr
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 16th, 2010, 6:14 pm |
Joined: June 12th, 2010, 7:34 pm Posts: 55
|
jeeman wrote: jparr wrote: svenpup wrote: The way the the % works is it cycles on and off like a microwave oven, not lowering the wattage. I doubt you will save electricity going to the larger cell, but the cell will last longer. The only real problem with going too big is that you lose granularity of control. Imagine that you are set to 5% and it is too much, but 4% is too low. If you cell was half the size this would equate to 10% and 8%, so you could set it to 9%. My CircuPool unit appears to be varying the voltage depending on the output percentage. The cloudiness of the water leaving the cell gets heavier when the output is set higher, and I have never seen it not producing chlorine even when set to 40%. jparr, Your setup looks similar to what mine would be. What percentage do you run yours at? What FC do you maintain? Jeeman I'm still dialing it in, but it seems that 40% or so running nine hours a day is able to maintain 8ppm FC. My FC dropped down to 5.5 after a heavy bather load, and was able to catch up and recover in about 24 hours using the super chlorinate feature (24 hours at 100%)
_________________ 17,000 Gallon plaster pool. Hayward Perflex EC65 DE Filter. 3/4 HP Hayward Superpump. CircuPool RJ45. Skimmer, floor drain, two returns.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Strannik
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 17th, 2010, 4:22 am |
| In The Industry & Supporter |
 |
Joined: July 24th, 2007, 8:01 pm Posts: 806 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
JasonLion wrote: Strannik wrote: the cells are usually rated at 100% output so if you run it at 50% the life will be longer While totally true, I don't feel this captures what is really happening. Cell life time can be thought of as producing some fixed total amount of chlorine over the life of the cell. If you buy a cell that is twice as large, it will produce twice as much chlorine in it's lifetime. Since you will actually adjust it to produce chlorine at the same rate, the pools needs some constant amount of chlorine/day regardless of cell size, the twice as large cell will last twice as long. it's not quite that simplistic, but at a high level - yeah apart from production capacity, there are also other parameters that affect the life of it, like cell design, controller design, cell material, voltage/amps it's running at, water temp. etc. plus if you are comparing between manufacturers it's really like comparing apples to oranges, as cell material will be different in most cases. so if you take a large cell and run it at 50% it might last you twice as long from when it runs at 100%, or 1.5 times, or 3 times.
_________________ AutoChlor Saltwater Chlorine Generators http://www.tdchlorinators.com.au/ taras@tdchlorinators.com.au
Compare costs of BBB vs Salt Water Chlorinators
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Strannik
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 17th, 2010, 4:26 am |
| In The Industry & Supporter |
 |
Joined: July 24th, 2007, 8:01 pm Posts: 806 Location: Brisbane, Australia
|
jeeman wrote: So then, for a 15k gallon pool, is it safe to say that an SWG for 20k gallons can be run about 100% for 3 years, an SWG for 30k gallons can be run at 50% for roughly 5-6 years, and an SWG for 45k gallons can be run at 33% for roughly around 8-9 years? I'm guessing the math doesn't work like that? Probably more like an extra year for each 15k gallon jump in size?
Jeeman i'd be speculating. see my reply to Jason above. one thing i can say is that we had few occasions of customers bringing cells for replacement that lasted up to 12 years, with expected lifespan for those being 3 at the time they were made. so obviously they were doing something different to everyone else.
_________________ AutoChlor Saltwater Chlorine Generators http://www.tdchlorinators.com.au/ taras@tdchlorinators.com.au
Compare costs of BBB vs Salt Water Chlorinators
|
|
|
|
 |
|
jeeman
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 29th, 2010, 5:48 pm |
Joined: June 3rd, 2010, 2:03 pm Posts: 31
|
|
So, I bought the Circupool RJ-45...now I am waiting for it to arrive. Where should I put it? In between the filter and the heater, or between the heater and the return? There is more pipe to play with between the filter and heater, but it's also higher (2.5 feet) off the ground....the heater to return has only about 5 feet to play with, but it's pretty near the ground.
_________________ ~13X42 irregular sized 17k gallon IG pool, with jacuzzi. Pentair Intelliflo VF pump, Purex Triton DE filter (48 sqft), Pentair heater. BBB method, although I'm really only good at one B (bleach).
|
|
|
|
 |
|
bk406
|
Post subject: Re: SWG size matters?  Posted: August 29th, 2010, 6:43 pm |
Joined: December 3rd, 2009, 11:28 am Posts: 2423 Location: Central Massachusetts
|
|
After the heater. It should be the last thing before water goes back into the pool. You dont want all that undiluted chlorine in the heater.
_________________ 14,000 gallon IG, Vinyl. Hayward 3/4 hp superpump, Penatair IC40 SWCG, Pentair automation, Hayward sand filter, Aqua Comfort heat pump, Hayward 400k Lo-Nox LP heater.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|