Questionable New Pump Installation

I would not want a pump balanced on a piece of foam that is further balanced on some rocks.

Whose responsibility is it to provide a stable surface for the pump? Was it within the local companies scope of work to redo your equipment pad? Who should have cleaned up your equipment pad of the debris so the installer had a good surface to install the pump?

I would remove the foam and the rocks and put the pump on the concrete pad that it looks like is under that stuff. But I do not know if that was in the installers scope of work.
 
I don't think you need a 3 hp pump for a 12K gallon pool unless you have a lot of water features or a hot tub connected to it.

A proper base for the pump to sit on is important. Concrete pavers (on a proper base) are inexpensive. I have my pump on a dense rubber paver, a foam pad is to soft and will compress over time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jayjayaz
A larger pump will move the same the same amount of water using less electricity. The efficiency and flexibility of a larger pump is worth the slightly higher cost.
The saving of a larger pump is the ability to run slower and move less water (but still enough) to filter effectively than a single speed pump. There is a minimum RPM the pumps run efficiently at, especially if it is restricted by one skimmer and one return. The energy required to move X gallon/per minute against Y restriction is a set number of watts (or joules/sec). The energy consumption difference between a 3 HP and 1.5 hp VS pump is probably minimal. Unfortunately pump mfg's don't publish data for power consumption based on flow and head. The risk with a 3 hp pump in this situation is what happens if the pump runs at full speed? It may over pressurise the pumping or downstream equipment. There is also a cavitation risk. The pump should be sized based on the plumbing limitations.
 

Enjoying this content?

Support TFP with a donation.

Give Support
At my age, things often go right over my head as Jim's post has done.

Is there really a valid benefit to a 3 HP pump that offsets the increased cost? I haven't looked at pump ricing in years.......is it less than 100-150?
 
Dave,

This is one of those cases where there are many different opinions and none of them are always right or wrong..

I personally like larger VS speed pumps as you can run them slower and still move plenty of water. The slower you can run them, the less electricity they use and the quieter they are. At my normal running speed, you almost have to touch the pump to make sure it is still running. :mrgreen:

I like to run 24/7, as I have a SWCG, and I can do that for less than $20 bucks a month. I have three 3 HP IntelliFlo pumps that have been running 24/7 for well over 10 years. They run today, just like they did when new. Everyone here will be the '2nd' to know the instant any of them fail.

Without any proof, I personally believe that the larger VS pumps are more robust than the smaller 1.5 HP pumps.

I like the fact that you can always turn up the flow on a larger pump, when needed, and this might not be the case of the smaller VS pump.

I think the point is that I 'see' VS pumps from my experience, and you 'see' VS pumps from your experience.. Does not make either one of us right or wrong, we just see things from different view points.

Thanks,

Jim R.
 
  • Like
Reactions: newdude
I also think you "benefits" are valid ones, but at what cost?

Pentair Superflo VS 1.5HP 2.2THP - $1,439


Pentair Whisperflo VST 2.6THP - $1,809


Pentair Intelliflo3 VSF 3HP (w/touchscreen) - $1,829
(wo/touchscreen) - $1,600


B+D 1.5HP Pump $989

B+D 3HP Pump $1,300


So 1.5HP -> 3HP from Pentair is $390

1.5HP -> 3HP from B+D is $311
 
  • Like
Reactions: pjt and newdude