|
It is currently May 24th, 2012, 4:43 pm
|
 |
|
 |
|
| Author |
Message |
|
balagon
|
Post subject: Matte vs. glazed waterline tile  Posted: June 11th, 2010, 8:36 pm |
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am Posts: 27 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
|
Is there any advantage to using matte-finish or glazed finish tiles at the waterline? My husband and I are down to three finalists in our "pick a tile already" contest, one glazed (manufacturer is Fujima), two matte (National Pool Tile), and we're spinning our wheels. If one of these tends to do better with longevity/resisting waterline scum buildup/whatever, that might help us make a decision. There's no price difference, and we're in no-need-to-winterize Southern California. One other factor is that the barrier between the pool and spillover spa is topped with tile, which I walk on to brush the pool and spa walls. I'm not a big person at all, but maybe one type of tile finish is more sensitive to that type of use?
There was a matte Master Tile that we really liked, but it is apparently failing longevity testing. The manufacturer says it'll be reformulated and available in two or three months, so it's out of contention. Darn!
_________________ 25k 20x40 oval white plaster with overflow spa DE filter Aquabot T2
|
|
|
|
 |
|
balagon
|
Post subject: Re: Matte vs. glazed waterline tile  Posted: June 11th, 2010, 9:25 pm |
Joined: June 1st, 2007, 11:27 am Posts: 27 Location: Los Angeles, CA
|
Thanks, Dave. Even though it didn't help cut down our options. 
_________________ 25k 20x40 oval white plaster with overflow spa DE filter Aquabot T2
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|